ROSEMEAD — Southern California Edison’s parent company announced Friday it is shutting down the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station in northern San Diego County near the Orange County line, the latest chapter of a saga that began with a small leak of radioactive steam.
Ted Craver, the chairman and CEO of Edison International, Edison’s corporate parent, cited uncertainty about when the two units at the plant, which were taken offline because of technical issues, would be allowed to restart.
“We have concluded that the continuing uncertainty about when or if [San Onofre] might return to service was not good for our customers, our investors, or the need to plan for our region’s long-term electricity needs,” he said in a statement released from the company’s headquarters here.
The statement also said that the administrative process to gain regulatory approval to restart could have lasted more than a year, entailing a cost too great to bear.
“It is uneconomic for [Edison] and its customers to bear the long-term repair costs for returning [San Onofre] to full power operation without restart of Unit 2,” the statement continued.
Edison estimates that it will record a charge in the second quarter of the current fiscal year of between $450 million and $650 million before taxes, or about $300 million to $425 million after taxes. The utility estimated in February that the closure had already cost it $400 million.
The plant’s two reactor units, referred to as Unit 2 and Unit 3, have been offline since early 2012. Unit 1 was in operation from 1968 to 1992, when it was shut down over fears it could not withstand a major earthquake.
Unit 2 was taken out of service Jan. 9, 2012, for planned routine maintenance, while Unit 3 was shut down abruptly on Jan. 31, 2012, after a small leak of radioactive steam occurred. No one was hurt, but both reactors were kept offline while the issue was investigated.
Edison executives would later reveal the leak was caused by premature wearing of steam pressure tubes in the reactors. Each reactor has nearly 20,000 tubes and hundreds of those were found to have been worn down prematurely by rubbing against each other due to vibrations and a settling of support equipment.
The tubes carry hot, pressurized radioactive water from the reactors. The tubes then heat non-radioactive water surrounding them, producing steam used to turn turbines to create electricity.
The tubes also provide a critical safety function, forming a barrier between the radioactive and non-radioactive sides of the plant.
Edison has spent months trying to gain permission from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to restart one unit at 70 percent power for five months as a test run.
However, the plan has been strongly opposed by the anti-nuclear group Friends of the Earth and Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who accused Edison of skirting federal regulations designed to prevent such mishaps.
And former NRC head Gregory Jaczko said in San Diego this week that the restart plan instilled no confidence because it effectively suggested that Edison lacked the confidence to run the plant at full power.
Opponents contend that Edison executives were not forthright in how they characterized replacement steam generators installed in the reactor units in 2009 and 2010. They recently released a series of communications they believe demonstrate that Edison executives knew the generators were of a radically different design than their predecessors.
“We have long said that these reactors are too dangerous to operate and now Edison has agreed,” Friends of the Earth President Erich Pica said Friday morning. “The people of California now have the opportunity to move away from the failed promise of dirty and dangerous nuclear power and replace it with the safe and clean energy provided by the sun and the wind.”
Edison said Friday it would pursue damages from Mitsubishi Heavy Industries of Japan, the company that supplied the replacement steam generators that wore out sooner than expected.
In connection with the retirement of Units 2 and 3, about 1,100 workers at San Onofre will lose their jobs over the next year.
“This situation is very unfortunate,” said Pete Dietrich, Edison’s chief nuclear officer, noting that “this is an extraordinary team of men and women. We will treat them fairly.”
Prior to being shuttered early last year, San Onofre was able to keep the lights on in 1.4 million Southern California homes. Edison is the majority owner but San Diego Gas & Electric and the city of Riverside each have a small stake.
San Diego Gas & Electric has said the plant’s shutdown has not affected its ability to serve residents in San Diego County, largely because of the Sunrise Powerlink that came online last summer. The major transmission line is capable of carrying 800 megawatts of electricity — nearby double San Diego Gas & Electric’s share of energy from San Onofre — from the Imperial County desert into San Diego and southern Orange County.
Edison executives said they would continue to work with the California Independent System Operator, the California Energy Commission and the California Public Utilities Commission in planning for its customers’ energy needs.
“The company is already well into a summer reliability program and has completed numerous transmission upgrades in addition to those completed last year,” Edison President Ron Litzinger said.
“Thanks to consumer conservation, energy efficiency programs and a moderate summer, the region was able to get through last summer without electricity shortages. We hope for the same positive result again this year, although generation outages, soaring temperatures or wildfires impacting transmission lines would test the system.”
Gov. Jerry Brown released a statement that said, “Since San Onofre nuclear power plant went offline last year, energy utilities and the state have worked to provide Southern California with reliable electric power year round. At my direction, California’s top energy experts will continue developing a long-term plan that ensures there is reliability for decades to come. As we move into the hot summer months, we can all do our part by continuing to conserve.”