Rihanna Home

12/10/2013 4:39 pm0 commentsViews: 24




won a round in court today when a judge
ruled that a home inspection firm will remain a defendant in a lawsuit in which
the singer claims her former Beverly Hills home became flooded during rainy
weather, just months after she bought it.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Yvette Palazuelos denied a motion by
attorney Gregory Pyfrom, representing LaRocca Inspection Associates Inc., to
dismiss Rihanna’s claims.
Pyfrom argued Rihanna had until January 2011, because of a one-year
statute of limitations, to bring any claims against his client. The suit was
filed eight months later.
Rihanna hired LaRocca Inspection Associates in the summer of 2009 to do
an analysis of the Janice Place property for any needed repairs by the owners.
She alleges they did not make sure water seepage problems in the hardwood
floors were fixed before escrow closed on the $6.9 million purchase.
Pyfrom maintained Rihanna was aware of a problem at her home in late
2009 and early 2010 when her management team, including members of her security
entourage, exchanged emails about water intrusion in the home caused by heavy
rains, Pyfrom said.
In May 2010, an engineering report was prepared on behalf of the
entertainer’s insurance company that detailed the water damage, according to
“She can’t say, `I’m this celebrity and I don’t have to look at
anything at any time for any reason,”’ Pyfrom argued.
But Palazuelos said it is up to a jury to decide whether the water leaks
were enough to put Rihanna on notice that it might be due in part to the
“professional negligence” of the LaRocca inspectors.
Rihanna’s suit names several other defendants — including Prudential
California Realty, which employed the singer’s real estate agent — and the
home’s prior owner, Adrian Rudomin.
The 25-year-old singer — who filed the complaint under her real name,
Robyn Fenty — alleges negligence, fraud and breach of contract.
LaRocca countersued Rihanna and the other defendants in January 2012.
LaRocca alleges the “SOS” singer breached their contract by not coming
forward sooner and letting them know her problems with their work and give them
a chance to do another inspection.
In another motion set for a hearing before Palazuelos on Wednesday,
Pyfrom is asking for $7,500 in compensation from Rihanna for what he says are
the costs of two years of legal work trying to take her deposition.
But Rihanna’s lawyer, Miles Cooley, counters in his court papers that
his client has “consistently agreed” to be deposed.
“Instead of withdrawing its motion, LaRocca insists on carrying out a
smear campaign against (Rihanna), sets forth over 120 pages of email and court
documents and shamelessly reveals confidential settlement offers and mediation
results,” Cooley’s court papers state.
Cooley is asking Palazuelos to deny the motion as moot or deny the
motion “as a remedy for LaRocca’s patently improper disclosures.”
Cooley states in his court papers that Pyfrom’s argument “portrays a
one-sided picture that omits the fact the parties had an agreement not to
depose (Rihanna) until after the matter was mediated.”
The mediation was delayed several times because of Pyfrom’s vacation
plans, according to Cooley’s court papers.


Leave a Reply